DI-UMONS : Dépôt institutionnel de l’université de Mons

Recherche transversale
Rechercher
(titres de publication, de périodique et noms de colloque inclus)
2017-03-08 - Colloque/Présentation - communication orale - Anglais - 4 page(s)

Denis Jennifer , cazemajou anne, Ollagnier-Beldame Magali, Coupé Christophe, Hendrick Stéphan , "Towards a comprehensive view on processes of psychotherapeutic interventions" in International Systemic Research Conference 2017 “Linking Systemic Research and Practice”, Heidelberg, Allemagne, 2017

  • Codes CREF : Psychothérapie (DI3526), Psychiatrie (DI3521), Méthodes de recherche en psychologie (DI4223), Psychologie clinique (DI3524)
  • Unités de recherche UMONS : Psychologie clinique systémique et psychodynamique (P351)
  • Instituts UMONS : Institut des Sciences et Technologies de la Santé (Santé)
  • Centres UMONS : Mind & Health (CREMH)

Abstract(s) :

(Anglais) In this panel we investigate how protagonists of the therapy – therapist and patient – live their therapeutic process. To bring to this end, a range of situations is studied: first encounters; clinical reasoning in critical situations and autoregulation mechanisms in real time. Three approaches are considered : - The first study investigates situations of first encounter. Ollagnier-Beldame, Coupé and Cazemajou examine how therapists adjust their behavior; get their information from themselves and co-construct the intersubjective space. This research is conducted in a “naïve” perspective in regards to the therapeutic process. It is designed to run external gaze focused on this process. - The second study is conducted by a clinician-researcher, expert in crisis intervention. Denis evaluates therapeutic processes in psychiatric emergency room (PER). She aims to analyze experts’ lived-experiences of therapeutic action. She especially discusses the evaluation of the emotional, mental and nonverbal criteria on which experts rely on to adjust the therapeutic relationship. - The third study conducted by Hendrick describes how a clinician attempts to regulate in real time the therapeutic process he leads. Our studies are grounded in a first-person epistemology. Our purpose is the improvement of the quality of therapeutic relationship by describing the advantages and disadvantages of these three approaches. We believe that reflexivity is a powerful attitude to understand and transform practices in a lasting way.